skia /
skia /
402448d6818cab9d7b7633a0c18fcf574c915357 skia: blend32_16_row for neon version
This includes blend32_16_row neon implementation
for aarch32 and aarch64.
For performance,
blend32_16_row is called in following tests in nanobench.
- Xfermode_SrcOver
- tablebench
- rotated_rects_bw_alternating_transparent_and_opaque_srcover
- rotated_rects_bw_changing_transparent_srcover
- rotated_rects_bw_same_transparent_srcover
- luma_colorfilter_large
- luma_colorfilter_small
- chart_bw
I can see perf increase in following two tests, especially. For others, looks
similar.
For each, I tried to run two times.
1) Xfermode_SrcOver
<org>
- D/skia ( 2000): 3M 57 17.3µs 17.4µs 17.4µs 17.7µs 1%
█▃▂▃▂▂▂▁▃▂ 565 Xfermode_SrcOver
- D/skia ( 1915): 3M 70 13.5µs 16.9µs 16.7µs 18.8µs 9%
▆█▄▅█▁▅▅▆▄ 565 Xfermode_SrcOver
<new>
- D/skia ( 2000): 3M 8 11.6µs 11.8µs 12.1µs 14.4µs 7%
▃█▁▁▂▁▁▁▂▂ 565 Xfermode_SrcOver
- D/skia ( 2004): 3M 62 10.3µs 12.9µs 13µs 15.2µs 11%
█▅▅▆▁▅▅▅▇▃ 565 Xfermode_SrcOver
2)
luma_colorfilter_large
<org>
- D/skia ( 2000): 159M 8 136µs 136µs 136µs 139µs 1%
█▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁ 565 luma_colorfilter_large
- D/skia ( 1915): 158M 2 135µs 177µs 182µs 269µs 22%
▆▃█▁▁▃▃▃▃▃ 565 luma_colorfilter_large
<new>
- D/skia ( 2000): 157M 5 84.2µs 85.3µs 87.5µs 110µs 9%
█▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁ 565 luma_colorfilter_large
- D/skia ( 2004): 159M 6 84.7µs 110µs 112µs 144µs 18%
█▄▇▁▁▄▃▄▄▆ 565 luma_colorfilter_large
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/847363002
4 files changed
