| commit | f034c86756d45bed61b86310d9e4e77db2d05df3 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org> | Wed Sep 13 03:29:20 2017 -0400 |
| committer | Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org> | Wed Sep 20 13:13:35 2017 -0700 |
| tree | fe48867bc9a9be080b5b0efa25ce9e678267d0af | |
| parent | a4bd5b7c7a06fe39d1461f9be098af37d364dcc2 [diff] |
Print ranges as closed as opposed to half-open There's nothing assymetrical about how we match them. Previously we "considered" them half-open because the OS/2 spec had usLowerOpticalPointSize as inclusive and usUpperOpticalPointSize as exclusive. But we do not respect that. Note that the parsing code accepts both anyway, because of the way our sscanf() usage is written...