Glyph 0xFFFF is a valid glyph.
Assert that the hb_codepoint_t passed to skhb_glyph_extents is in range
using SkTo, which is obviously correct (and consistently used elsewhere)
instead of the incorrect '< 0xFFFF' since 0xFFFF is a valid glyph id.
While doing so, rename the hb_codepoint_t parameters which are actually
glyph ids to reflect that they are glyphs and not codepoints (HarfBuzz
uses hb_codepoint_t for both).
Change-Id: I0bf2b7f12183dfb8254856b12168b8bee867c430
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/265769
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <bungeman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <bungeman@google.com>
1 file changed
