If you're looking to write your own Wuffs code outside of its standard library, e.g. you want to safely decode your own custom file format, see the Wuffs the Language document and the /hello-wuffs-c example instead of this document.
If you‘re looking to just use the Wuffs standard library, e.g. you want to safely decode some gzip’ed data in your C program, see the Wuffs the Library document and the other examples instead of this document.
If you‘re looking to modify the Wuffs language, it’s probably best to ask the mailing list.
If you're looking to modify the Wuffs standard library, keep reading.
First, install the Go toolchain in order to build the Wuffs tools. To run the test suite, you might also have to install C compilers like clang and gcc, as well as C libraries (and their .h files) like libjpeg and libpng, as some tests compare that Wuffs produces exactly the same output as these other libraries.
Running go get -v github.com/google/wuffs/cmd/...
will download and install the Wuffs tools. Change get
to install
to re-install those programs without downloading, e.g. after you‘ve modified their source code, or after a manually issued git pull
. The Wuffs tools that you’ll most often use are wuffsfmt
(analogous to clang-format
, gofmt
or rustfmt
) and wuffs
(roughly analogous to make
, go
or cargo
).
You should now be able to run wuffs test
. If all goes well, you should see some output containing the word “PASS” multiple times.
Feel free to edit the std/lzw/decode_lzw.wuffs
file, which implements the GIF LZW decoder. After editing, run wuffs gen std/gif
or wuffs test std/gif
to re-generate the C edition of the Wuffs standard library's GIF codec, and optionally run its tests.
Try deleting an assert statement and re-running wuffs gen
. The result should be syntactically valid, but a compile error, as some bounds checks can no longer be proven.
Find the var bits : base.u32
line, which declares the bits variable, implicitly initialized to zero. Try adding bits -= 1
on a new line of code after all of the var
lines. Again, wuffs gen
should fail, as the computation can underflow.
Similarly, changing the 4095
in var prev_code : base.u32[..= 4095]
either higher or lower should fail.
Try adding assert false
at various places, which should obviously fail, but should also cause wuffs gen
to print what facts the compiler knows at that point. This can be useful when debugging why Wuffs can't prove something you think it should be able to.
If you've changed any of the tools (i.e. changed any .go
code), re-run go install -v github.com/google/wuffs/cmd/...
and go test github.com/google/wuffs/lang/...
.
If you‘ve changed any of the libraries (i.e. changed any .wuffs
code), run wuffs test
or, ideally, wuffs test -mimic
to also check that Wuffs’ output mimics (i.e. exactly matches) other libraries' output, such as giflib for GIF, libpng for PNG, etc.
If your library change is an optimization, run wuffs bench
or wuffs bench -mimic
both before and after your change to quantify the improvement. The mimic benchmark numbers shouldn‘t change if you’re only changing .wuffs
code, but seeing zero change in those numbers is a coherence check on any unrelated system variance, such as software updates or virus checkers running in the background.